Target: J. Crew Group Inc.
Price: $2.86 billion
Sponsors: TPG Capital, Leonard Green & Partners LP
Clothing retailer J. Crew Group Inc. violated its settlement of a shareholder lawsuit over its proposed takeover by the buyouts shops
J. Crew executives undermined a deal under which the company agreed to extend a period for competing bids to the $2.86 billion offer made by the buyout firms, Stuart Grant, a lawyer for shareholders objecting to the takeover, said in a court filing. The deal had included a $10 million payment to the plaintiffs if the firms bought J. Crew.
While the parties agreed to the extension until Feb. 15 of the “go shop” period that had expired Jan. 15, Grant said J. Crew had undermined the agreement with its Jan. 18 disclosure of the results of the first “go shop” period.
By also setting a record date for investors eligible to vote on a final buyout offer and releasing a proxy statement before the expiration of the extended “go shop” period, Grant said the company showed it clearly favored the TPG offer.
J. Crew officials “sent the signal to the world that they are investing all resources in closing the deal with TPG as soon as possible, and that nobody else should bother to bid for J. Crew,” Grant said in a letter to Delaware Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine.
Grant added that J. Crew officials had turned the extended “go shop” period for competing bids into a “charade.”
Shareholder lawsuits had protested the proposed sale price and asserted that Millard Drexler, J. Crew’s chairman and CEO, had breached his fiduciary duties to investors.
J. Crew called the Jan. 18 agreement with the shareholders binding and said it intended to proceed with a planned shareholder vote on March 1.
“The company will challenge any attempt to change or revoke it,” J. Crew said of the agreement in an e-mail statement. J. Crew said it has honored its obligations under the agreement.
“The agreement, subject to court approval, settles the putative class-action lawsuit pending in Delaware chancery court against the company and others in connection with the proposed acquisition,” J .Crew added.
“In light of defendants’ actions to undermine the benefits of the settlement, plaintiffs now intend to focus all efforts towards obtaining a very significant monetary recovery after a trial in this matter,” Grant said in the letter.
Ben Klayman is a Reuters correspondent in Detroit.